转:析构函数

析构函数在下边3种情况时被调用: 1.对象生命周期结束,被销毁时; 2.delete指向对象的指针时,或delete指向对象的基类类型指针,而其基类虚构函数是虚函数时; 3.对象i是对象o的成员,o的析构函数被调用时,对象i的析构函数也被调用。

情况1请看下边代码:

#include<iostream.h> 
class A {
public: A() { cout<<"constructing A"<<endl; }
~A() { cout<<"destructing A"<<endl; }
private: int a;
};
class B: public A {
public: B() { cout<<"constructing B"<<endl; }
~B() { cout<<"destructing B"<<endl; }
private: int b;
};
void main() {
B b;
}

运行结果为:

constructing A 
constructing B 
destructing B 
destructing A

上述代码还说明了一件事:析构函数的调用顺序与构造函数的调用顺序相反。

情况2则正好说明了为什么基类应该把析构函数声明为虚函数,请先看下边的例子:

#include<iostream.h>

class A {  
public:  A()  {   cout<<"constructing A"<<endl;  }   
~A()  {   cout<<"destructing A"<<endl;  }  
private:  int a; 
}; 

class B: public A {  
public:  B()  {   cout<<"constructing B"<<endl;  }  
~B()  {   cout<<"destructing B"<<endl;  }  
private:  int b; 
};

void main() {  
  A* a = new B;
  delete a; 
}

运行结果为:

constructing A
 
constructing B
destructing A


若将class A中的析构函数声明为虚函数,运行结果将变成:

constructing A constructing B destructing B destructing A

由此还可以看出虚函数还是多态的基础,才c++中没有虚函数就无法实现多态。因为不声明成虚函数就不能“推迟联编”,所以不能实现多态。这点上和java不同,java总是“推迟联编”的,所以也剩了这些麻烦。

扯远了,再看情况3,通过下边代码表示:

 #include<iostream.h> 
class A {  
public:  A()  {   cout<<"constructing A"<<endl;  }  
~A()  {   cout<<"destructing A"<<endl;  }  
private:  int a; 
};

class C {  
public:  C()  {   cout<<"constructing C"<<endl;  }  
~C()  {   cout<<"destructing C"<<endl;  }  
private:   int c; 
};

class B: public A {  
public:  B()  {   cout<<"constructing B"<<endl;  }  
~B()  {   cout<<"destructing B"<<endl;  }  
private:  int b;
 C c; 
};

void main() {  B b; }

运行结果为:

constructing A 
constructing C 
constructing B 
destructing B 
destructing C 
destructing A

b的析构函数调用之后,又调用了b的成员c的析构函数,同时再次验证了析构函数的调用顺序与构造函数的调用顺序相反。

若将上边的代码中的main()函数内容改成

A* a = new B;  
delete a;   


由情况2我们知道,这将不会调用class B的析构函数不会被调用,所以class C的析构函数也不会被调用。 正如我们想的,运行结果为:

constructing A 
constructing C 
constructing B 
destructing A


原文地址:http://blog.csdn.net/weizhee/article/details/562833

原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/mliudong/p/3244365.html