华中师范大学2011年数学分析考研试题参考解答

来源 [尊重原有作者劳动成果]

 

一、

(1)证明:由于${{x}_{1}}in (0,frac{pi }{2}),{{x}_{n+1}}=sin {{x}_{n}}$,则${{x}_{n}}in (0,frac{pi }{2}),n=1,2,cdots $

且${{x}_{n+1}}=sin {{x}_{n}}le {{x}_{n}}$

于是${{{x}_{n}}}$单调递减且${{x}_{n}}in (0,frac{pi }{2})$

由单调有界原理可知:${{{x}_{n}}}$收敛

不妨设$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{x}_{n}}=lin [0,frac{pi }{2}]$,由${{x}_{n+1}}=sin {{x}_{n}}$,两边取极限,得$l=sin l$

解得$l=0$,即$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{x}_{n}}=0$

(2)证明:由(1)知:$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{x}_{n}}=0$,则$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{1}{x_{n}^{2}}=+infty $

由$Stolz$公式可知:

$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,n{{sin }^{2}}{{x}_{n}}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,nx_{n+1}^{2}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{n}{frac{1}{x_{n+1}^{2}}}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{n-(n-1)}{frac{1}{x_{n+1}^{2}}-frac{1}{x_{n}^{2}}}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{1}{frac{1}{{{sin }^{2}}{{x}_{n}}}-frac{1}{x_{n}^{2}}}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{x_{n}^{2}{{sin }^{2}}{{x}_{n}}}{x_{n}^{2}-{{sin }^{2}}{{x}_{n}}}$

$=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{x_{n}^{4}+o(x_{n}^{4})}{x_{n}^{2}-{{[{{x}_{n}}-frac{x_{n}^{3}}{3!}+o(x_{n}^{3})]}^{2}}}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{x_{n}^{4}+o(x_{n}^{4})}{frac{x_{n}^{4}}{3}+o(x_{n}^{4})}=3$

(3)证明:由(2)知:

$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{x_{n+1}^{2}}{frac{1}{n}}=3$

于是

$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{x_{n+1}^{p}}{{{(frac{1}{n})}^{frac{p}{2}}}}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{(frac{x_{n+1}^{2}}{frac{1}{n}})}^{frac{p}{2}}}={{3}^{frac{p}{2}}}$

则$sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{x_{n+1}^{p}}$与$sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{(frac{1}{n}}{{)}^{frac{p}{2}}}$收敛性相同

而$p2$时,$sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{(frac{1}{n}}{{)}^{frac{p}{2}}}$收敛;$ple 2$时,$sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{(frac{1}{n}}{{)}^{frac{p}{2}}}$发散

于是$p2$时,[sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{x_{n+1}^{p}}]收敛;

$ple 2$时,[sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{x_{n+1}^{p}}]发散

二、

(1)证明:由于${{{b}_{n}}}$有界,则存在$M0$,对一切$nin {{N}^{ ext{*}}}$,有$left| {{b}_{n}} ight|M$

由$alpha {{a}_{n+1}}+eta {{a}_{n}}={{b}_{n}}$

1:若$alpha =0 e eta $,此时${{b}_{n}}=eta {{a}_{n}}$,则$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{b}_{n}}$存在$Leftrightarrow underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{a}_{n}}$存在

2:若$alpha e 0$,则${{a}_{n+1}}=frac{1}{alpha }{{b}_{n}}-frac{eta }{alpha }{{a}_{n}}$

令$r=frac{eta }{alpha } e 1$,则

${{a}_{n}}=frac{1}{alpha }{{b}_{n-1}}-r{{a}_{n-1}}=frac{1}{alpha }{{b}_{n-1}}-r(frac{1}{alpha }{{b}_{n-2}}-r{{a}_{n-2}})=frac{1}{alpha }{{b}_{n-1}}-frac{r}{alpha }{{b}_{n-2}}+{{r}^{2}}{{a}_{n-2}}$

$=cdots =frac{1}{alpha }[{{b}_{n-1}}-r{{b}_{n-2}}+cdots +{{(-r)}^{n-2}}]+{{a}_{1}}cdot {{(-r)}^{n-1}}$

若$r=-1$,此时${{a}_{n}}=frac{1}{alpha }({{b}_{n-1}}+{{b}_{n-2}}+cdots +{{b}_{1}})+{{a}_{1}}$不一定恒有界(如${{b}_{n}}=frac{1}{n}$)

若$left| r ight|1$,由$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{left| r ight|}^{n-2}}=+infty $,则${{{a}_{n}}}$无界

从而$left| r ight|=left| frac{eta }{alpha } ight|1$,才使得${{{a}_{n}}}$恒有界

于是$left| alpha +eta ight|ge left| alpha ight|-left| eta ight|0Rightarrow alpha +eta e 0$

必要性:先给出法一,是种非常复杂的方法,但是比较实用

法一:

若${{{b}_{n}}}$收敛,不妨设$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{b}_{n}}=b$,进一步设${{b}_{n}}=b+{{varepsilon }_{n}}$,其中$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{varepsilon }_{n}}=0$

于是

${{a}_{n+1}}=frac{1}{alpha }{{b}_{n}}-r{{a}_{n}}=frac{b+{{varepsilon }_{n}}}{alpha }-r{{a}_{n}}$

${{a}_{n+2}}=frac{1}{alpha }{{b}_{n+1}}-r{{a}_{n+1}}=frac{b+{{varepsilon }_{n+1}}}{alpha }-r{{a}_{n+1}}=frac{b+{{varepsilon }_{n+1}}}{alpha }-r(frac{b+{{varepsilon }_{n}}}{alpha }-r{{a}_{n}})=frac{b(1-r)}{alpha }+frac{{{varepsilon }_{n+1}}-r{{varepsilon }_{n}}}{alpha }+{{r}^{2}}{{a}_{n}}$

$vdots $

${{a}_{n+k}}=frac{b}{alpha }[1-r+{{r}^{2}}+cdots +{{(-r)}^{k-1}}]+frac{{{varepsilon }_{n+k-1}}-r{{varepsilon }_{n+k-2}}+cdots +{{(-1)}^{k-1}}{{varepsilon }_{n}}}{alpha }+{{(-1)}^{k}}{{a}_{n}}$

由于

$frac{b}{alpha }[1-r+{{r}^{2}}+cdots +{{(-r)}^{k-1}}]=frac{b}{alpha }cdot frac{1-{{(-r)}^{k}}}{1+r}=frac{b}{alpha +eta }[1-{{(-r)}^{k}}]$

另一方面,由$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{varepsilon }_{n}}=0$,则对任意的$varepsilon 0$,存在${{N}_{1}}0$,当$n{{N}_{1}}$时,$left| {{varepsilon }_{n}} ight|frac{(1-left| r ight|)varepsilon }{2}$

于是$left| {{a}_{n+k}}-frac{b}{alpha +eta } ight|le left| frac{left| b ight|}{alpha +eta }+left| {{a}_{n}} ight| ight|cdot {{left| r ight|}^{k}}+frac{(1-left| r ight|)varepsilon }{2}cdot frac{1-{{left| r ight|}^{k}}}{1-left| r ight|}$

而$underset{k o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{left| r ight|}^{k}}=0$,则对上述$varepsilon 0$,存在${{N}_{2}}0$,当$n{{N}_{2}}$时,有

$left| frac{left| b ight|}{alpha +eta }+left| {{a}_{n}} ight| ight|cdot {{left| r ight|}^{k}}frac{varepsilon }{2}$,$frac{(1-left| r ight|)varepsilon }{2}cdot frac{1-{{left| r ight|}^{k}}}{1-left| r ight|}$

令$N=max {{{N}_{1}},{{N}_{2}}}$,当$nN$时,有$left| {{a}_{n}}-frac{b}{alpha +eta } ight|varepsilon $

即$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{a}_{n}}=frac{b}{alpha +eta }$

法二:

首先以下三个命题成立:

$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,({{u}_{n}}+{{v}_{n}})=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{u}_{n}}+underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{v}_{n}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,({{u}_{n}}+{{v}_{n}})=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{u}_{n}}+underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{v}_{n}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{u}_{n}}=-overline{underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,}{{u}_{n}}$

不妨设[overline{underset{n o infty }{mathop{lim }}\,}{{a}_{n}}={{a}_{1}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{a}_{n}}={{a}_{2}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{b}_{n}}=b]

由于${{{a}_{n}}},{{{b}_{n}}}$都是有界数列

则${{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},b$都是有限值,且${{b}_{n}}=alpha {{a}_{n+1}}+eta {{a}_{n}}$可知:

取上极限得:$alpha {{a}_{1}}=b+eta {{a}_{2}}$

取下极限得:$eta {{a}_{1}}=b+alpha {{a}_{2}}$

由$alpha e eta $可知:${{a}_{1}}={{a}_{2}}$,即${{{a}_{n}}}$存在

充分性:

若${{{a}_{n}}}$收敛,则${{{a}_{n+1}}}$也收敛,于是${{{b}_{n}}}$收敛

法二:首先以下三个命题成立:

$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,({{u}_{n}}+{{v}_{n}})=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{u}_{n}}+underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{v}_{n}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,({{u}_{n}}+{{v}_{n}})=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{u}_{n}}+underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{v}_{n}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{u}_{n}}=-overline{underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,}{{u}_{n}}$

不妨设[overline{underset{n o infty }{mathop{lim }}\,}{{a}_{n}}={{a}_{1}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{underline{lim }}}\,{{a}_{n}}={{a}_{2}},underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,{{b}_{n}}=b]

由于${{{a}_{n}}},{{{b}_{n}}}$都是有界数列

则${{a}_{1}},{{a}_{2}},b$都是有限值,且${{b}_{n}}=alpha {{a}_{n+1}}+eta {{a}_{n}}$可知:

取上极限得:$alpha {{a}_{1}}=b+eta {{a}_{2}}$

取下极限得:$eta {{a}_{1}}=b+alpha {{a}_{2}}$

由$alpha e eta $可知:${{a}_{1}}={{a}_{2}}$,即${{{a}_{n}}}$存在

(2)若$alpha =eta $,则必要性不成立,充分性成立

只需取${{a}_{n}}={{(-frac{eta }{alpha })}^{n}}={{(-1)}^{n}}$,此时${{{a}_{n}}}$不收敛,但

${{b}_{n}}=alpha {{a}_{n+1}}+eta {{a}_{n}}=0$收敛

三、

(1)解:不存在,理由如下:

反证法:不妨设存在满足条件的$f(x)$

由$f(x)0$且$f(x)=f(f(x))0$,则$f(x)$严格单调递增

且$f(x)=f(f(x))f(0)$

令$a1$,则

$int_{-a}^{0}{f(x)dx=f(0)-f(-a)f(0)[0-(-a)]=af(0)}$

于是$f(-a)f(0)-af(0)=(1-a)f(0)0$与$f(x)0$矛盾

于是不存在满足条件的$f(x)$

(2)只有零解,同样利用反证法

若$f(x)$有零点但不恒为$0$(没有零点则回归到(1))

记${{x}_{0}}=sup {xin R|f(x)=0}$

由$f(x)$有零点(集合非空)但不恒为$0$且单调不减(集合有上界)

则$f(x)=0,forall xin (-infty ,{{x}_{0}})$,由上确界的定义以及$f(x)$的连续性可知:

$f({{x}_{0}})=0,f(x)0,xin ({{x}_{0}},+infty )$

于是$f(x)=0,xin (-infty ,{{x}_{0}})$,下证${{x}_{0}}=0$

若不然,不妨设${{x}_{0}}0=f({{x}_{0}})$,由局部有界性可知:存在${{delta }_{0}}0$,

$forall xin ({{x}_{0}},{{x}_{0}}+{{delta }_{0}}),f(x){{x}_{0}},f(x)=f(f(x))=0$

于是$f(x)=0,forall xin (-infty ,{{x}_{0}}+{{delta }_{0}})$矛盾

同理可证${{x}_{0}}0$的情况也不成立

于是${{x}_{0}}=0$

于是$f(x)0,xin (0,+infty )$,则$f(x)=f(f(x))0,xin (0,+infty )$

由微分中值定理可知,

$f(x)=f(f(x))=f(f(x))-f(0)=f(eta )(f(x)-0)f(x)f(x),eta in (0,x)$

于是$f(x)1,xin (0,+infty )$,且$f(x)$在$x=0$右连续

于是$f(0)ge 1$与$f(0)=0$矛盾

于是满足条件的$f(x)equiv 0,xin R$

四、解:

(1)不满足,考虑到不存在区域$D:left| x ight|le ,left| y ight|le b$,使得${{F}_{x}}$在$D$上连续且${{F}_{y}}(0,0)=0$

于是$F(x,y)$在$(0,0)$附近不满足$F(x,y)=0$的隐函数存在定理条件

从而$F(x,y)$在$(0,0)$附近不满足$F(x,y)=0$

(2)存在,由于$y$严格单调升,$sin (left| x ight|y)$在$(0,0)$附近关于$y$严格单调升,故在$(0,0)$附近关于$y$严格单调升。

而$F(x,y)$在$(0,0)$附近区域$D:left| x ight|le a,left| y ight|le b, $上连续。

固定$x=0$因$F(0,y) $在$ [-y,y] $上是的严格单调增函数,且$F(0,0)=0$

由函数的连续性知有$F(0,-b)0,F(0,b)0. $

考虑一元连续函数$F(x,-b) $

由于$F(0,-b)0, $所以存在${{eta }_{1}}0$,使得$F(x,-b)0,xin U(0,{{eta }_{1}})$

明显也存在${{eta }_{2}}0, $使得$F(x,b)0,xin U(0,{{eta }_{2}})$

令$eta =min ({{eta }_{1}},{{eta }_{2}}),$则对$forall xin U(0,eta ) $有$F(x,-b)0,F(x,b)0$

设$ar{x}$为$U(0,eta ) $中任一点,则 $F(ar{x},-b)cdot F(ar{x},b)0$

又由于作为$y$的函数$F(ar{x},y) $严格增加

故必存在唯一的点$ar{y}in (-b,b) $使得$F(ar{x},ar{y})=0$。

由$ar{x}$的任意性就确定了唯一的隐函数$y=f(x) $,显然$0=f(0) $。

再设${{x}_{1}}$是$U(0,eta ) $的任意一点,记 ${{y}_{1}}=f({{x}_{1}}),$

对$forall varepsilon 0$作两根平行线$y={{y}_{1}}+varepsilon ,y={{y}_{1}}-varepsilon $

类似上面的证明知 存在$U({{x}_{1}},delta ) $使得对$forall xin ({{x}_{1}},delta ) $有$F(x,{{y}_{1}}+varepsilon )0,F(x,{{y}_{1}}-varepsilon )0. $由于作为$y$的连续函数$F(x,y) $的严格增加性,在$ ({{y}_{1}}-varepsilon ,{{y}_{1}}+varepsilon ) $上存在唯一的一个实点$y_{{}}^{{}}$使得$F(x,y)=0$,这说明对于$forall xin ({{x}_{1}},delta ) $有$left| f(x)-f({{x}_{1}}) ight|varepsilon . $故$y=f(x) $在$U(0,eta ) $内连续。

显然,$F(x,0)=0$于是由$F(x,y)=0$在$(0,0)$附近确定隐函数$y=f(x) $的唯一性知$y=f(x)equiv 0$ ,其导函数${y}equiv 0$

五、

(1)解:由于$left| frac{{{x}^{3}}-{{y}^{3}}}{{{x}^{2}}+{{y}^{2}}} ight|le left| frac{{{x}^{3}}}{{{x}^{2}}+{{y}^{2}}} ight|+left| frac{{{y}^{3}}}{{{x}^{2}}+{{y}^{2}}} ight|le frac{1}{2}({{x}^{2}}+{{y}^{2}})$

而$underset{(x,y) o (0,0)}{mathop{lim }}\,frac{1}{2}({{x}^{2}}+{{y}^{2}})=0$可知,$underset{(x,y) o (0,0)}{mathop{lim }}\,f(x,y)=underset{(x,y) o (0,0)}{mathop{lim }}\,frac{{{x}^{3}}-{{y}^{3}}}{{{x}^{2}}+{{y}^{2}}}=0=f(0,0) $

从而$f(x,y)$在$(0,0)$处连续

(2)解:当$(x,y) e (0,0)$时,由于

${{f}_{x}}(0,0)=underset{Delta x o 0}{mathop{lim }}\,frac{f(Delta x,0)-f(0,0)}{Delta x}=1,{{f}_{y}}(0,0)=underset{Delta y o 0}{mathop{lim }}\,frac{f(0,Delta y)-f(0,0)}{Delta y}=-1$

可知$f(x,y)$的偏导数${{f}_{x}}(x,y),{{f}_{y}}(x,y)$在$(0,0)$存在

(3)解:考虑到

$underset{ ho o 0}{mathop{lim }}\,frac{f(Delta x,Delta y)-f(0,0)-{{f}_{x}}(0,0)Delta x-{{f}_{y}}(0,0)Delta y}{ ho }=underset{ ho o 0}{mathop{lim }}\,frac{frac{{{(Delta x)}^{3}}-{{(Delta y)}^{3}}}{{{(Delta x)}^{2}}+{{(Delta y)}^{2}}}-Delta x+Delta y}{sqrt{{{(Delta x)}^{2}}+{{(Delta y)}^{2}}}}$

令$Delta y=kDelta x$,于是

$underset{Delta x o 0}{mathop{lim }}\,frac{frac{{{(Delta x)}^{3}}-{{k}^{3}}{{(Delta x)}^{3}}}{(1+{{k}^{2}}){{(Delta x)}^{2}}}-Delta x+kDelta x}{sqrt{1+{{k}^{2}}}Delta x}=frac{(1-{{k}^{3}})+(k-1)(1+{{k}^{2}})}{{{(1+{{k}^{2}})}^{frac{3}{2}}}}=frac{k-{{k}^{2}}}{{{(1+{{k}^{2}})}^{frac{3}{2}}}}$与$k$有关

从而$f(x,y)$在$(0,0)$不可微

六、

(1)证明:当${{x}_{n}}=1+frac{1}{n}$时,此时考虑$sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{frac{ln (n+2)}{{{n}^{1+frac{1}{n}}}}}$

由$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{frac{ln (n+2)}{{{n}^{1+frac{1}{n}}}}}{frac{1}{n}}=+infty $且$sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{frac{1}{n}}$发散

从而$sumlimits_{n=1}^{+infty }{frac{ln (1+nx ext{)}}{{{n}^{x}}}}$在$(1,+infty )$上不一致收敛

(2)证明:由于$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{frac{ln [1+(n+1)x]}{{{(n+1)}^{x}}}}{frac{ln (1+nx ext{)}}{{{n}^{x}}}}=underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,$

七、

(1)证明:由积分第二中值定理可知:

$left| int_{0}^{a}{f(x)sin nxdx} ight|=left| f(0)int_{0}^{b}{sin nxdx+f(a)int_{b}^{a}{sin nxdx}} ight|=left| f(0)frac{1-cosnb}{n}+f(a)frac{cos nb-cos na}{n} ight|$$le frac{2left| f(0) ight|+left| f(a) ight|}{n}$

而$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,frac{2left| f(0) ight|+left| f(a) ight|}{n}=0$可知$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,int_{0}^{a}{f(x)sin nxdx}=0$

(2)不妨设$f(x)$在$[0,+infty )$上单调递增,由

$int_{0}^{+infty }{f(x)sin nxdx=}int_{0}^{2pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+int_{2pi }^{3pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+int_{3pi }^{4pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+}cdots }}$

$ge int_{0}^{2pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+}f(2pi )int_{2pi }^{3pi }{sin nxdx}+f(3pi )int_{3pi }^{4pi }{sin nxdx+cdots }$

$=int_{0}^{2pi }{f(x)sin nxdx}$

$int_{0}^{+infty }{f(x)sin nxdx=}int_{0}^{pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+int_{pi }^{2pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+int_{2pi }^{3pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+}cdots }}$

$le int_{0}^{pi }{f(x)sin nxdx+}f(2pi )int_{pi }^{2pi }{sin nxdx}+f(3pi )int_{2pi }^{3pi }{sin nxdx+cdots }$

$=int_{0}^{pi }{f(x)sin nxdx}$

于是$int_{0}^{2pi }{f(x)sin nxdxle }int_{0}^{+infty }{f(x)sin nxdxle }int_{0}^{pi }{f(x)sin nxdx}$

两边取极限,由夹逼原理及(1)知$underset{n o +infty }{mathop{lim }}\,int_{0}^{+infty }{f(x)sin nxdx=0}$

八、证明:$uin {{C}^{2}}(overline{Omega })$及$u$为非常值函数知$iintlimits_{Omega }{left[ {{left( frac{partial u}{partial x} ight)}^{2}}+{{left( frac{partial u}{partial y} ight)}^{2}} ight]}dxdy0$,令

$P=-ufrac{partial u}{partial y},Q=ufrac{partial u}{partial x},$则因$uin {{C}^{2}}(overline{Omega }),$利用格林公式

$iintlimits_{Omega }{left( frac{partial Q}{partial x}-frac{partial P}{partial y} ight)dxdy=iintlimits_{Omega }{left[ {{left( frac{partial u}{partial x} ight)}^{2}}+{{left( frac{partial u}{partial y} ight)}^{2}}+uleft( frac{{{partial }^{2}}u}{partial {{x}^{2}}}+frac{{{partial }^{2}}u}{partial {{y}^{2}}} ight) ight]}dxdy=ointlimits_{partial Omega }{left( -ufrac{partial u}{partial y} ight)dx+ufrac{partial u}{partial x}dy}}$

因$uleft| _{partial Omega }=0, herefore ointlimits_{partial Omega }{left( -ufrac{partial u}{partial y} ight)dx+ufrac{partial u}{partial x}dy=0} ight. $

于是$iintlimits_{Omega }{uleft( frac{{{partial }^{2}}u}{partial {{x}^{2}}}+frac{{{partial }^{2}}u}{partial {{y}^{2}}} ight)dxdy=-iintlimits_{Omega }{left[ {{left( frac{partial u}{partial x} ight)}^{2}}+{{left( frac{partial u}{partial y} ight)}^{2}} ight]}dxdy}0$

原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/zhangzujin/p/4054208.html