Android Handler 具体解释

Android开发中常常使用Handler来实现“跨越线程（Activity）更新UI”。本文将从源代码角度回答：为什么使用Handler可以跨线程更新UI？为什么跨线程更新UI一定要用Handler？

Demo

Demo1. 用Handler更新UI

以下这个Demo全然是为了演示“跨线程更新UI”而写的。

界面上仅仅有一个TextView和一个Button。按下Button创建一个后台线程。该后台线程每隔一秒更新一次TextView。连续更新10次。结束。

Activity的代码例如以下：

public class MainActivity extends Activity {
    static final String TAG = "MainActivity";

    Handler handler = null;

    @Override
    protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
        super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
        setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);

        final TextView text = (TextView)findViewById(R.id.txtHello);
        Button button = (Button)findViewById(R.id.btnRun);

        button.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener(){
            @Override
            public void onClick(View v) {
                Log.d(TAG, "clicked!");
                new Thread() {
                    public void run() {
                        for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
                            Message msg = new Message();
                            msg.what = 1;
                            msg.obj = "item-"+i;

                            handler.sendMessage(msg);
                            Log.d(TAG, "sended "+"item-"+i);

                            try {
                                Thread.sleep(1000);
                            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                                e.printStackTrace();
                            }
                        }
                    }
                }.start();
            }
        });

        handler = new Handler() {
            @Override
            public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
                String str = "unknow";
                switch(msg.what) {
                    case 1:
                        str =  (String)msg.obj;
                        break;
                    default:
                        break;
                }
                Log.d(TAG, "recv " + str);
                text.setText(str);
                super.handleMessage(msg);
            }
        };
    }

    @Override
    public boolean onCreateOptionsMenu(Menu menu) {
        // Inflate the menu; this adds items to the action bar if it is present.
        getMenuInflater().inflate(R.menu.main, menu);
        return true;
    }

}

布局文件较为简单：

<RelativeLayout xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android"
    xmlns:tools="http://schemas.android.com/tools"
    android:layout_width="match_parent"
    android:layout_height="match_parent"
    android:paddingBottom="@dimen/activity_vertical_margin"
    android:paddingLeft="@dimen/activity_horizontal_margin"
    android:paddingRight="@dimen/activity_horizontal_margin"
    android:paddingTop="@dimen/activity_vertical_margin"
    tools:context=".MainActivity" >

    <TextView
        android:id="@+id/txtHello"
        android:layout_width="wrap_content"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:text="@string/hello_world" />

    <Button 
        android:id="@+id/btnStart"
        android:layout_width="wrap_content"
        android:layout_height="wrap_content"
        android:text="Start"
        />
</RelativeLayout>

这里展示的是Handler的典型使用方法——用来更新UI控件。

以下再展示一个非典型使用方法。不过为了后面的分析方便。

Demo2. 自制ActivityThread模拟Activity

本例是为了分析方便而创建的；使用一个线程LooperThread来模拟Activity。

后面阐述为什么要这么做，代码例如以下：

package com.example.handlerdemo;

import android.os.Bundle;
import android.os.Message;
import android.app.Activity;
import android.util.Log;
import android.view.Menu;
import android.view.View;
import android.widget.Button;
import android.widget.TextView;

public class MainActivity extends Activity {
    static final String TAG = "MainActivity";

    ActivityThread acitivityThread = null;

    @Override
    protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
        super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
        setContentView(R.layout.activity_main);
        setupViews();
    }

    private void setupViews() {
        TextView tv = (TextView)findViewById(R.id.txtHello);
        Button bt = (Button)findViewById(R.id.btnStart);

        Log.d(TAG, String.format("[MainActivity] Thread %s(%d)",
                     Thread.currentThread().getName(), Thread.currentThread().getId()));
        acitivityThread = new ActivityThread();
        acitivityThread.start();

        acitivityThread.waitForHandlerReady();

        bt.setOnClickListener(new View.OnClickListener() {
            @Override
            public void onClick(View v) {
                new Thread() {
                    @Override
                    public void run() {
                        for(int i=0; i<10; i++) {
                            Message msg = new Message();
                            msg.what = i;
                            acitivityThread.mHandler.sendMessage(msg);
                            try {
                                Thread.sleep(1000);
                            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                                e.printStackTrace();
                            }
                        }
                    }
                }.start();
            }
        });
    }

    @Override
    public boolean onCreateOptionsMenu(Menu menu) {
        // Inflate the menu; this adds items to the action bar if it is present.
        getMenuInflater().inflate(R.menu.main, menu);
        return true;
    }
}

MainActivity.java

package com.example.handlerdemo;

import android.os.Handler;
import android.os.Looper;
import android.os.Message;
import android.util.Log;

public class ActivityThread extends Thread {
    static final String TAG = "LooperThread";

    public Handler mHandler = null;

    public ActivityThread() {
        super("LooperThread");
    }

    @Override
    public void run() {
        Looper.prepare();

        synchronized(this) {
            mHandler = new Handler() {
                @Override
                public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
                    Log.d(TAG, String.format("recv msg.what: %d in Thread: %s(%d)", msg.what,
                               Thread.currentThread().getName(),Thread.currentThread().getId()));
                }
            };
            this.notify();
        }

        Looper.loop();
    }

    public void waitForHandlerReady() {
            try {
                synchronized(this) {
                    while(mHandler == null)
                        this.wait();
                }
            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
                e.printStackTrace();
            }
    }
}

ActivityThread.java

这个Demo的布局文件非常easy。就不贴出来了。

为什么使用Handler可以跨线程更新UI?

概览

以Demo2为例，这个Demo至少涉及三个线程：GodActivity线程。ActivityThread线程（模拟UI）。匿名线程（GodActivity创建的。叫他aThread）。暂且把GodActivity当做上帝。把ActivityThread看做Demo1里的Activity。如今，我们先预览一下为什么aThread能够通过Handler来更新ActivityThread的UI（纯属虚构）。这两个线程的交互关系例如以下图所看到的：

（PS:此前的版本号画了非常多对象的生命线。结果非常混乱，删了一堆无关紧要的之后，立马清晰了，^_^）

这个序列图（Sequence Diagram）已经简洁明了地给出了答案：

1. Activity线程的幕后另一个MessageQueue；MessageQueue故名思议是一个Message组成的Queue。
2. aThread仅仅是将数据以Message的形式挂到了Activity幕后的MessageQueue上了；
3. Activity线程从MessageQueue上取Message并调用Handler.handlerMessage，所以实际的“更新动作”还是发生在Activity线程内；

具体解释

以下将从Android 4.4.4源代码的角度分析Handler的“幕后黑手”。

几个关键类

Demo2中和Handler有关的类除了MessageQueue还有Message和Looper，这几个类的关系例如以下：

关键点：

• MessageQueue通过Message.next维护链表结构（java引用即指针）；
• ActivityThread的消息循环被封装在Looper.loop()内，Looper.prepare()用于创建属于当前线程的Looper和MessageQueue。
  
• 每一个Message能够通过target指向一个Handler，Handler实际上就是一个用来处理Message的callback。

接下来的代码，仅仅贴代码片段（方法），假设对各类的属性有所疑惑。能够回头查看此图。

Looper.prepare()

依据Looper的凝视能够看到，Looper线程“三部曲”：

1. Looper.prepare()
2. new Handler() { /* override handleMessage() */ }
3. Looper.loop();

以下逐渐切入Looper.prepare()：

    public static void prepare() {
        prepare(true);
    }

Looper.java

无參数版本号调用了有參数版本号：

    private static void prepare(boolean quitAllowed) {
        if (sThreadLocal.get() != null) {
            throw new RuntimeException("Only one Looper may be created per thread");
        }
        sThreadLocal.set(new Looper(quitAllowed)); // 放入“单例”中
    }

Looper.java

这段代码中引用了sThreadLocal。它被定义为ThreadLocal类型。即线程私有数据类型（或者叫做线程级别单例）

ThreadLocal<T>可以理解为Map<Thread,T>的一层包包装（实际上Android，JVM都是按Map实现的，感兴趣的同学可自行研究；set(value)时，以当前线程对象为key，所以每一个线程可以保存一份value。）

可见Looper.prepare()调用使得AcitivityThread通过Looper.sThreadLocal<Looper>持有了一个Looper对象。

继续看Looper的构造方法Looper(quitAllowed)：

    private Looper(boolean quitAllowed) {
        mQueue = new MessageQueue(quitAllowed); 
        mThread = Thread.currentThread(); // 和当前线程关联
    }

Handler.java

能够看到Looper的构造函数中创建了一个MessageQueue。

流程又转到了MessageQueue的构造函数MessageQueue(quitAllowed)：

    MessageQueue(boolean quitAllowed) {
        mQuitAllowed = quitAllowed;
        mPtr = nativeInit();
    }

MessageQueue.java

Handler()

首先看上面调用的默认构造方法：

    /**
     * Default constructor associates this handler with the {@link Looper} for the
     * current thread. 将当前线程的Looper与此handler关联。
     *   假设当前线程没有looper，这个handler将不能接收消息，从而导致异常抛出
     * If this thread does not have a looper, this handler won't be able to receive messages
     * so an exception is thrown.
     */
    public Handler() {
        this(null, false);
    }

Handler.java

默认构造方法又调用了还有一版本号的构造方法，例如以下：

    public Handler(Callback callback, boolean async) {
        if (FIND_POTENTIAL_LEAKS) { // FIND_POTENTIAL_LEAKS 为 false;
            final Class<? extends Handler> klass = getClass();
            if ((klass.isAnonymousClass() || klass.isMemberClass() || klass.isLocalClass()) &&
                    (klass.getModifiers() & Modifier.STATIC) == 0) {
                Log.w(TAG, "The following Handler class should be static or leaks might occur: " +
                    klass.getCanonicalName());
            }
        }

        mLooper = Looper.myLooper(); // 获取当前线程（调用者）的Looper
        if (mLooper == null) { // 假设当前线程没有Looper。则抛异常
            throw new RuntimeException( 
                "Can't create handler inside thread that has not called Looper.prepare()");
        }
        mQueue = mLooper.mQueue; // 这里引用的MessageQueue是Looper()中创建的
        mCallback = callback;
        mAsynchronous = async;
    }

Handler.java

Handler()调用了Looper.myLooper()：

    public static Looper myLooper() {
        return sThreadLocal.get(); // 从该线程的“单例”中取出Looper对象
    }

Looper.java

Looper.loop()

Looper.loop()封装了消息循环。所以我们如今看看Looper.loop()的“真面目”：

    public static void loop() {
        final Looper me = myLooper();
        if (me == null) {
            throw new RuntimeException("No Looper; Looper.prepare() wasn't called on this thread.");
        }
        final MessageQueue queue = me.mQueue;

        // Make sure the identity of this thread is that of the local process,
        // and keep track of what that identity token actually is.
        Binder.clearCallingIdentity();
        final long ident = Binder.clearCallingIdentity();

        for (;;) {
            Message msg = queue.next(); // might block, 取出消息
            if (msg == null) {
                // No message indicates that the message queue is quitting.
                return;
            }

            // This must be in a local variable, in case a UI event sets the logger
            Printer logging = me.mLogging;
            if (logging != null) {
                logging.println(">>>>> Dispatching to " + msg.target + " " +
                        msg.callback + ": " + msg.what);
            }

                // mLatencyLock is only initialized for non USER builds
                // (e.g., USERDEBUG and ENG)
                if ((!sLatencyEnabled) || (me != sMainLooper)) {
                    msg.target.dispatchMessage(msg); // 通过msg.target分派消息
                }
                else { // 记录性能数据
                    long t1 = SystemClock.uptimeMillis(); // 获得当前毫秒数（自启动）
                    msg.target.dispatchMessage(msg);
                    long t2 = SystemClock.uptimeMillis() - t1; // t2就是dispatchMessage(msg)所用时间
                    if (t2 < 50) {
                        // We don't care about these from a latency perspective
                    }
                    else if (t2 < 250) {
                        // Fast response that usually has low impact on user experience
                        sLatencyCountFast++;
                        sLatencySumFast += t2;
                        if (sLatencyCountFast >= 100) {
                            String name = getProcessName();
                            long avg = sLatencySumFast / sLatencyCountFast;
                            EventLog.writeEvent(2731, "mainloop2_latency1", name, avg);
                            sLatencyCountFast = 0;
                            sLatencySumFast = 0;
                        }
                    }
                    else if (t2 < 1000) {
                        sLatencyCountSlow++;
                        sLatencySumSlow += t2;
                        if (sLatencyCountSlow >= 10) {
                            String name = getProcessName();
                            long avg = sLatencySumSlow / sLatencyCountSlow;
                            EventLog.writeEvent(2731, "mainloop2_latency2", name, avg);
                            sLatencyCountSlow = 0;
                            sLatencySumSlow = 0;
                        }
                    }
                    else {
                        String name = getProcessName();
                        EventLog.writeEvent(2731, "mainloop2_bad", name, t2);
                    }
                }

            if (logging != null) {
                logging.println("<<<<< Finished to " + msg.target + " " + msg.callback);
            }

            // Make sure that during the course of dispatching the
            // identity of the thread wasn't corrupted.
            final long newIdent = Binder.clearCallingIdentity();
            if (ident != newIdent) {
                Log.wtf(TAG, "Thread identity changed from 0x"
                        + Long.toHexString(ident) + " to 0x"
                        + Long.toHexString(newIdent) + " while dispatching to "
                        + msg.target.getClass().getName() + " "
                        + msg.callback + " what=" + msg.what);
            }

            msg.recycle();
        }
    }

Looper.java

能够看到。Looper.loop()的for循环实际上就是“消息循环”，它负责从消息队列（MessageQueue）中不断地取出消息（MessageQueue.next），然后通过msg.target来派发（dispatch）消息。

How to dispatch?

以下看看Message究竟是怎样被dispatch的：

    public void dispatchMessage(Message msg) {
        if (msg.callback != null) { // 方法 1
            handleCallback(msg); 
        } else {
            if (mCallback != null) {
                if (mCallback.handleMessage(msg)) { // 方法 2
                    return;
                }
            }
            handleMessage(msg); // 方法 3
        }
    }

Handler.java

从这段代码能够看出，实现正常的Message处理有三种方式：

1. 为Message.callback注冊一个Runnable实例。
2. 为Handler.mCallback注冊一个Handler.Callback实例。
3. 重写Handler的handleMessage方法。

另外。这三种方法优先级依次减少。且一个Message仅仅能有一种处理方式。

Message的发送与获取

对于一个后台线程，它要发出消息（Handler.sendMessage）。对于Activity线程，它要得到其它线程发来的消息（MessageQueue.next）；而这两种工作都是以MessageQueue为基础的。以下。分别分析发送和接收的详细流程：

Handler.sendMessage()

Demo中后台线程正是通过Handler.sendMessage实现向Activity发消息的。Handler.sendMessage方法的代码例如以下：

    public final boolean sendMessage(Message msg)
    {
        return sendMessageDelayed(msg, 0);
    }

Handler.java

    public final boolean sendMessageDelayed(Message msg, long delayMillis)
    {
        if (delayMillis < 0) {
            delayMillis = 0;
        }
        return sendMessageAtTime(msg, SystemClock.uptimeMillis() + delayMillis);
    }

Handler.java
当中，当中SystemClock.uptimeMillis()返回自启动以来CPU经过的毫秒数。

    public boolean sendMessageAtTime(Message msg, long uptimeMillis) {
        MessageQueue queue = mQueue;
        if (queue == null) {
            RuntimeException e = new RuntimeException(
                    this + " sendMessageAtTime() called with no mQueue");
            Log.w("Looper", e.getMessage(), e);
            return false;
        }
        return enqueueMessage(queue, msg, uptimeMillis);
    }

Handler.java

Handler.enqueMessage事实上仅仅是对MessageQueue.enqueueMessage的简单包装：

    private boolean enqueueMessage(MessageQueue queue, Message msg, long uptimeMillis) {
        msg.target = this; // 将当前Handler（通常已重写handleMessage方法）与该Message绑定（通过target）
        if (mAsynchronous) {
            msg.setAsynchronous(true);
        }
        return queue.enqueueMessage(msg, uptimeMillis); // 调用MessageQueue.enqueueMessage
    }

Handler.java

这里看到了Looper.loop()里引用的target的来源。

流程转到了MessageQueue.enqueueMessage()，看命名基本知道它是入队操作。代码例如以下：

    boolean enqueueMessage(Message msg, long when) {
        if (msg.isInUse()) {
            throw new AndroidRuntimeException(msg + " This message is already in use.");
        }
        if (msg.target == null) {
            throw new AndroidRuntimeException("Message must have a target.");
        }

        synchronized (this) { // 临界区
            if (mQuitting) {
                RuntimeException e = new RuntimeException(
                        msg.target + " sending message to a Handler on a dead thread");
                Log.w("MessageQueue", e.getMessage(), e);
                return false;
            }

            msg.when = when;
            Message p = mMessages; // 链表头
            boolean needWake;
            if (p == null || when == 0 || when < p.when) {
                // p == null 队列为空
                // when == 0 由 Handler.sendMessageAtFrontOfQueue() 发出
                // when < p.when 新消息的when比队头要早
                // New head, wake up the event queue if blocked.
                msg.next = p;    // 将msg放到队头，step 1
                mMessages = msg; // 将msg放到队头，step 2
                needWake = mBlocked;
            } else {
                // Inserted within the middle of the queue.  Usually we don't have to wake 插到队列中间。
通常我们不必唤醒
                // up the event queue unless there is a barrier at the head of the queue 事件（event）队列。除非队头有一个barrier，
                // and the message is the earliest asynchronous message in the queue.且消息是队列中最早的同步消息。

                needWake = mBlocked && p.target == null && msg.isAsynchronous();
                Message prev;
                for (;;) { // 遍历链表
                    prev = p;
                    p = p.next;
                    if (p == null || when < p.when) { // 到“尾部”了 或 新消息比当前消息更早
                        break;
                    }
                    if (needWake && p.isAsynchronous()) {
                        needWake = false;
                    }
                }
                // 下面两行将msg插入prev和p之间
                msg.next = p; // invariant: p == prev.next
                prev.next = msg;
            }

            // We can assume mPtr != 0 because mQuitting is false.
            if (needWake) {
                nativeWake(mPtr); // 通知前台线程“有消息来啦”
            }
        }
        return true;
    }

MessageQueue.java
依据这段代码可知，MessageQueue上的Message是依照when大小排列的。唯一可能让人疑惑的是最后的nativeWake。稍后讨论。

MessageQueue.next()

前文的Looper.loop方法通过MessageQueue.next()取出消息，如今看看它是怎样实现的：

    Message next() {
        int pendingIdleHandlerCount = -1; // -1 only during first iteration
        int nextPollTimeoutMillis = 0;
        for (;;) {
            if (nextPollTimeoutMillis != 0) {
                Binder.flushPendingCommands();
            }

            // We can assume mPtr != 0 because the loop is obviously still running.
            // The looper will not call this method after the loop quits.
            nativePollOnce(mPtr, nextPollTimeoutMillis); // 等待通知，可能堵塞

            synchronized (this) {
                // Try to retrieve the next message.  Return if found.
                final long now = SystemClock.uptimeMillis();
                Message prevMsg = null;
                Message msg = mMessages; // 链表头
                if (msg != null && msg.target == null) {
                    // Stalled by a barrier.  Find the next asynchronous message in the queue.
                    do { // 遍历链表
                        prevMsg = msg;
                        msg = msg.next;
                    } while (msg != null && !msg.isAsynchronous());
                }
                if (msg != null) {
                    if (now < msg.when) {
                        // Next message is not ready.  Set a timeout to wake up when it is ready.
                        nextPollTimeoutMillis = (int) Math.min(msg.when - now, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
                    } else {
                        // Got a message.
                        mBlocked = false;
                        if (prevMsg != null) {
                            prevMsg.next = msg.next; // 将msg节点摘下
                        } else { // prevMsg == null, msg是链表头
                            mMessages = msg.next;
                        }
                        msg.next = null; // msg与MessageQueue“断绝关系”
                        if (false) Log.v("MessageQueue", "Returning message: " + msg);
                        msg.markInUse();
                        return msg; // 退出点1 到这为止。是常规逻辑
                    }
                } else {
                    // No more messages.
                    nextPollTimeoutMillis = -1;
                }

                // Process the quit message now that all pending messages have been handled.
                if (mQuitting) {
                    dispose();
                    return null; // 退出点2 
                }

                // If first time idle, then get the number of idlers to run.
                // Idle handles only run if the queue is empty or if the first message
                // in the queue (possibly a barrier) is due to be handled in the future.
                if (pendingIdleHandlerCount < 0
                        && (mMessages == null || now < mMessages.when)) {
                    pendingIdleHandlerCount = mIdleHandlers.size();
                }
                if (pendingIdleHandlerCount <= 0) {
                    // No idle handlers to run.  Loop and wait some more.
                    mBlocked = true;
                    continue; 
                }

                if (mPendingIdleHandlers == null) {
                    mPendingIdleHandlers = new IdleHandler[Math.max(pendingIdleHandlerCount, 4)];
                }
                mPendingIdleHandlers = mIdleHandlers.toArray(mPendingIdleHandlers);
            }

            // Run the idle handlers.
            // We only ever reach this code block during the first iteration.
            for (int i = 0; i < pendingIdleHandlerCount; i++) {
                final IdleHandler idler = mPendingIdleHandlers[i];
                mPendingIdleHandlers[i] = null; // release the reference to the handler

                boolean keep = false;
                try {
                    keep = idler.queueIdle();
                } catch (Throwable t) {
                    Log.wtf("MessageQueue", "IdleHandler threw exception", t);
                }

                if (!keep) {
                    synchronized (this) {
                        mIdleHandlers.remove(idler);
                    }
                }
            }

            // Reset the idle handler count to 0 so we do not run them again.
            pendingIdleHandlerCount = 0;

            // While calling an idle handler, a new message could have been delivered
            // so go back and look again for a pending message without waiting.
            nextPollTimeoutMillis = 0;
        }
    }

MessageQueue.java

MessageQueue.next()相同让人疑惑的是nativePollOnce，稍后也将见分晓。

小结

MessageQueue.next()和MessageQueue.sendMessage()分别被Activity线程、后台线程调用，而他们两个线程可能同一时候在调用这两个方法，所以他们共享并改动的成员变量须要加锁，这就是synchronized (this)出现的原因。

至此，已经可以完整的回答“为什么用Handler可以实现跨线程更新UI”。简单的说，Activity线程的背后都有一个消息队列（MessageQueue）。后台线程通过Handler的sendMessage方法向这个消息队列上放消息。Activity线程将消息从消息队列上取下来之后，通过详细Handler的handleMessage方法处理消息，而更新UI的代码就在这个handleMessage中。所以。后台线程并没有做实际的“更新”，仅仅是将要更新的内容以借助MessageQueue告诉了Activity线程，Activity线程才是实际做“更新”动作的人。

简言之。Handler并没有真正的实现“跨线程”更新UI，而是将要更新的数据（Message携带）和怎样更新（Handler携带）通过消息队列告诉了UI线程，UI线程才是真正的“幕后英雄”。

真正的ActivityThread

Demo2中的ActivityThread全然是虚构出来的，以下来看看Android的Activity究竟是不是想我虚构的那样有一个Looper。

经过上面的分析，能够从双方面验证：

1. 看看Activity源代码中运行onCreate之前是否调用了Looper.prepare()。

2. 运行onXXX方法时的CallStack上是否有Looper.loop();
   

第二点非常easy验证。仅仅需在随意onXXX方法中打一个断点。然后看程序的CallStack,就一面了然了：

依据这个调用栈。能够非常明显的看到有Looper.loop；同一时候还能看到是ActivityThread.main调用它的。所以能够看看ActivityThread.main的源代码：

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        SamplingProfilerIntegration.start();

        // CloseGuard defaults to true and can be quite spammy.  We
        // disable it here, but selectively enable it later (via
        // StrictMode) on debug builds, but using DropBox, not logs.
        CloseGuard.setEnabled(false);

        Environment.initForCurrentUser();

        // Set the reporter for event logging in libcore
        EventLogger.setReporter(new EventLoggingReporter());

        Security.addProvider(new AndroidKeyStoreProvider());

        Process.setArgV0("<pre-initialized>");

        Looper.prepareMainLooper(); // 它和Looper.prepare相似

        ActivityThread thread = new ActivityThread();
        thread.attach(false);

        if (sMainThreadHandler == null) {
            sMainThreadHandler = thread.getHandler();
        }

        AsyncTask.init();

        if (false) {
            Looper.myLooper().setMessageLogging(new
                    LogPrinter(Log.DEBUG, "ActivityThread"));
        }

        Looper.loop();

        throw new RuntimeException("Main thread loop unexpectedly exited");
    }

ActivityThread.java

所以。上面提到的双方面都得到了验证。

即真正的ActivityThread是有Looper的。

Native浮云

细心的朋友可能会发现。上面MessageQueue的代码中还遗留几个native开头方法：nativeInit，nativePollOnce，nativeWake。

以下就来扫清这些“遮眼”的浮云。和这几个native方法直接相应的是：

static JNINativeMethod gMessageQueueMethods[] = {
    /* name, signature, funcPtr */
    { "nativeInit", "()I", (void*)android_os_MessageQueue_nativeInit },
    { "nativeDestroy", "(I)V", (void*)android_os_MessageQueue_nativeDestroy },
    { "nativePollOnce", "(II)V", (void*)android_os_MessageQueue_nativePollOnce },
    { "nativeWake", "(I)V", (void*)android_os_MessageQueue_nativeWake },
    { "nativeIsIdling", "(I)Z", (void*)android_os_MessageQueue_nativeIsIdling }
};

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

nativeInit

以下从adnroid_os_MessageQueue_nativeInit開始，顾名思义，nativeInit当然是完毕一些初始化工作的。

static jint android_os_MessageQueue_nativeInit(JNIEnv* env, jclass clazz) {
    NativeMessageQueue* nativeMessageQueue = new NativeMessageQueue(); // 创建了NativeMessageQueue
    if (!nativeMessageQueue) {
        jniThrowRuntimeException(env, "Unable to allocate native queue");
        return 0;
    }

    nativeMessageQueue->incStrong(env);
    return reinterpret_cast<jint>(nativeMessageQueue);
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

看看NativeMessageQueue的声明：

class NativeMessageQueue : public MessageQueue {
public:
    NativeMessageQueue();
    virtual ~NativeMessageQueue();

    virtual void raiseException(JNIEnv* env, const char* msg, jthrowable exceptionObj);

    void pollOnce(JNIEnv* env, int timeoutMillis);

    void wake();

private:
    bool mInCallback;
    jthrowable mExceptionObj;
};

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

NativeMessageQueue继承了MessageQueue，再来看看MessageQueue的声明：

class MessageQueue : public RefBase {
public:
    /* Gets the message queue's looper. */
    inline sp<Looper> getLooper() const {
        return mLooper;
    }

    /* Checks whether the JNI environment has a pending exception.
     *
     * If an exception occurred, logs it together with the specified message,
     * and calls raiseException() to ensure the exception will be raised when
     * the callback returns, clears the pending exception from the environment,
     * then returns true.
     *
     * If no exception occurred, returns false.
     */
    bool raiseAndClearException(JNIEnv* env, const char* msg);

    /* Raises an exception from within a callback function.
     * The exception will be rethrown when control returns to the message queue which
     * will typically cause the application to crash.
     *
     * This message can only be called from within a callback function.  If it is called
     * at any other time, the process will simply be killed.
     *
     * Does nothing if exception is NULL.
     *
     * (This method does not take ownership of the exception object reference.
     * The caller is responsible for releasing its reference when it is done.)
     */
    virtual void raiseException(JNIEnv* env, const char* msg, jthrowable exceptionObj) = 0;

protected:
    MessageQueue();
    virtual ~MessageQueue();

protected:
    sp<Looper> mLooper;
};

android_os_MessageQueue.h

如今看看NativeMessageQueue的构造函数：

NativeMessageQueue::NativeMessageQueue() : mInCallback(false), mExceptionObj(NULL) {
    mLooper = Looper::getForThread();
    if (mLooper == NULL) {
        mLooper = new Looper(false);
        Looper::setForThread(mLooper);
    }
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

NativeMessageQueue的构造函数又调用了Looper::getForThread()，Looper::Looper()和Looper::setThread()，当中getForThread和setForThread都是静态函数：

sp<Looper> Looper::getForThread() {
    int result = pthread_once(& gTLSOnce, initTLSKey);
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(result != 0, "pthread_once failed");

    return (Looper*)pthread_getspecific(gTLSKey);
}

Looper.cpp

这段代码中，在第一次运行pthread_once时将调用initTLSKey。

void Looper::initTLSKey() {
    int result = pthread_key_create(& gTLSKey, threadDestructor);
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(result != 0, "Could not allocate TLS key.");
}

Looper.cpp

void Looper::threadDestructor(void *st) {
    Looper* const self = static_cast<Looper*>(st);
    if (self != NULL) {
        self->decStrong((void*)threadDestructor);
    }
}

Looper.cpp

void Looper::setForThread(const sp<Looper>& looper) {
    sp<Looper> old = getForThread(); // also has side-effect of initializing TLS

    if (looper != NULL) {
        looper->incStrong((void*)threadDestructor);
    }

    pthread_setspecific(gTLSKey, looper.get());

    if (old != NULL) {
        old->decStrong((void*)threadDestructor);
    }
}

Looper.cpp

Looper::setForThread和getForThread中分别使用了pthread_setspecific，pthread_getsepcific，pthread_key_create，实现了线程私有的looper引用，这和Java层Looper类似。

Looper的构造函数例如以下：

Looper::Looper(bool allowNonCallbacks) :
        mAllowNonCallbacks(allowNonCallbacks), mSendingMessage(false),
        mResponseIndex(0), mNextMessageUptime(LLONG_MAX) {
    int wakeFds[2];
    int result = pipe(wakeFds);
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(result != 0, "Could not create wake pipe.  errno=%d", errno);

    mWakeReadPipeFd = wakeFds[0];
    mWakeWritePipeFd = wakeFds[1];

    result = fcntl(mWakeReadPipeFd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(result != 0, "Could not make wake read pipe non-blocking.  errno=%d",
            errno);

    result = fcntl(mWakeWritePipeFd, F_SETFL, O_NONBLOCK);
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(result != 0, "Could not make wake write pipe non-blocking.  errno=%d",
            errno);

    mIdling = false;

    // Allocate the epoll instance and register the wake pipe.
    mEpollFd = epoll_create(EPOLL_SIZE_HINT); // 用epoll实现IO多路复用，EPOLL_SIZE_HINT定义为8
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(mEpollFd < 0, "Could not create epoll instance.  errno=%d", errno);

    struct epoll_event eventItem;
    memset(& eventItem, 0, sizeof(epoll_event)); // zero out unused members of data field union
    eventItem.events = EPOLLIN;
    eventItem.data.fd = mWakeReadPipeFd;
    result = epoll_ctl(mEpollFd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, mWakeReadPipeFd, & eventItem); // 将Wake管道的读端加入到mEpollFd上
    LOG_ALWAYS_FATAL_IF(result != 0, "Could not add wake read pipe to epoll instance.  errno=%d",
            errno);
}

Looper.cpp
从Looper的构造函数能够看到，Looper的Wake是由管道+epoll实现的，且管道的两端fd都被设置为NONBLOCK的，并通过epoll实现IO多路复用。Looper的数据成员（data member）声明例如以下：

    struct Request {
        int fd;
        int ident;
        sp<LooperCallback> callback;
        void* data;
    };

    struct Response {
        int events;
        Request request;
    };

    struct MessageEnvelope {
        MessageEnvelope() : uptime(0) { }

        MessageEnvelope(nsecs_t uptime, const sp<MessageHandler> handler,
                const Message& message) : uptime(uptime), handler(handler), message(message) {
        }

        nsecs_t uptime;
        sp<MessageHandler> handler;
        Message message;
    };

    const bool mAllowNonCallbacks; // immutable

    int mWakeReadPipeFd;  // immutable
    int mWakeWritePipeFd; // immutable
    Mutex mLock;

    Vector<MessageEnvelope> mMessageEnvelopes; // guarded by mLock
    bool mSendingMessage; // guarded by mLock

    // Whether we are currently waiting for work.  Not protected by a lock,
    // any use of it is racy anyway.
    volatile bool mIdling;

    int mEpollFd; // immutable

    // Locked list of file descriptor monitoring requests.
    KeyedVector<int, Request> mRequests;  // guarded by mLock

    // This state is only used privately by pollOnce and does not require a lock since
    // it runs on a single thread.
    Vector<Response> mResponses;
    size_t mResponseIndex;
    nsecs_t mNextMessageUptime; // set to LLONG_MAX when none

Looper.h

Looper数据成员涉及的类型还有有：作为callback的LooperCallback，MessageHandler，以及Message：

class MessageHandler : public virtual RefBase {
protected:
    virtual ~MessageHandler() { }

public:
    /**
     * Handles a message.
     */
    virtual void handleMessage(const Message& message) = 0;
};

Looper.h

class LooperCallback : public virtual RefBase {
protected:
    virtual ~LooperCallback() { }

public:
    /**
     * Handles a poll event for the given file descriptor.
     * It is given the file descriptor it is associated with,
     * a bitmask of the poll events that were triggered (typically ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT),
     * and the data pointer that was originally supplied.
     *
     * Implementations should return 1 to continue receiving callbacks, or 0
     * to have this file descriptor and callback unregistered from the looper.
     */
    virtual int handleEvent(int fd, int events, void* data) = 0;
};

Looper.h

struct Message {
    Message() : what(0) { }
    Message(int what) : what(what) { }

    /* The message type. (interpretation is left up to the handler) */
    int what;
};

Looper.h

至此，android_os_MessageQueue_nativeInit分析完成。

nativeWake

接下来看看android_os_MessageQueue_nativeWake和android_os_MessageQueue_nativePollOnce。

static void android_os_MessageQueue_nativeWake(JNIEnv* env, jclass clazz, jint ptr) {
    NativeMessageQueue* nativeMessageQueue = reinterpret_cast<NativeMessageQueue*>(ptr);
    return nativeMessageQueue->wake();
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

android_os_MessageQueue_nativeWake调用了NativeMessageQueue::wake：

void NativeMessageQueue::wake() {
    mLooper->wake();
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp
NativeMessageQueue::wake直接将工作转交给了Looper::wake：

void Looper::wake() {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
    ALOGD("%p ~ wake", this);
#endif

    ssize_t nWrite;
    do {
        nWrite = write(mWakeWritePipeFd, "W", 1); // 向pipe的写段写入一个字节
    } while (nWrite == -1 && errno == EINTR);

    if (nWrite != 1) {
        if (errno != EAGAIN) {
            ALOGW("Could not write wake signal, errno=%d", errno);
        }
    }
}

Looper.cpp
能够看到nativeWake很easy，仅仅是向pipe上写一个字节。

但这是怎样唤醒等待的线程的呢？猜想：等待线程必定通过epoll_wait等在mEpollFd上，稍后将得到验证。

nativePollOnce

static void android_os_MessageQueue_nativePollOnce(JNIEnv* env, jclass clazz,
        jint ptr, jint timeoutMillis) {
    NativeMessageQueue* nativeMessageQueue = reinterpret_cast<NativeMessageQueue*>(ptr);
    nativeMessageQueue->pollOnce(env, timeoutMillis); // 调用NativeMessageQueue::pollOnce()
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

android_os_MessageQueue_nativeWake调用了NativeMessageQueue::pollOnce：

void NativeMessageQueue::pollOnce(JNIEnv* env, int timeoutMillis) {
    mInCallback = true;
    mLooper->pollOnce(timeoutMillis);
    mInCallback = false;
    if (mExceptionObj) {
        env->Throw(mExceptionObj);
        env->DeleteLocalRef(mExceptionObj);
        mExceptionObj = NULL;
    }
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

NativeMessageQueue::pollOnce调用了Looper::pollOnce：

    inline int pollOnce(int timeoutMillis) {
        return pollOnce(timeoutMillis, NULL, NULL, NULL);
    }

Looper.h

Looper::pollOnce(int)调用了还有一版本号的Looper::pollOnce：

int Looper::pollOnce(int timeoutMillis, int* outFd, int* outEvents, void** outData) {
    int result = 0;
    for (;;) {
        while (mResponseIndex < mResponses.size()) {
            const Response& response = mResponses.itemAt(mResponseIndex++); // 取出一个response
            int ident = response.request.ident;
            if (ident >= 0) {
                int fd = response.request.fd;
                int events = response.events;
                void* data = response.request.data;
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
                ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - returning signalled identifier %d: "
                        "fd=%d, events=0x%x, data=%p",
                        this, ident, fd, events, data);
#endif
                if (outFd != NULL) *outFd = fd;
                if (outEvents != NULL) *outEvents = events;
                if (outData != NULL) *outData = data;
                return ident;
            }
        }

        if (result != 0) {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
            ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - returning result %d", this, result);
#endif
            if (outFd != NULL) *outFd = 0;
            if (outEvents != NULL) *outEvents = 0;
            if (outData != NULL) *outData = NULL;
            return result;
        }

        result = pollInner(timeoutMillis);
    }
}

Looper.cpp

pollOnce的for(;;)循环里先查看是否还有没有取出的response，若有，取出一个马上返回；否则，调用Looper::pollInner，poll出一个IO事件（wake通知，后面可以看到）：

int Looper::pollInner(int timeoutMillis) {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
    ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - waiting: timeoutMillis=%d", this, timeoutMillis);
#endif

    // Adjust the timeout based on when the next message is due.
    if (timeoutMillis != 0 && mNextMessageUptime != LLONG_MAX) {
        nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
        int messageTimeoutMillis = toMillisecondTimeoutDelay(now, mNextMessageUptime);
        if (messageTimeoutMillis >= 0
                && (timeoutMillis < 0 || messageTimeoutMillis < timeoutMillis)) {
            timeoutMillis = messageTimeoutMillis;
        }
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
        ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - next message in %lldns, adjusted timeout: timeoutMillis=%d",
                this, mNextMessageUptime - now, timeoutMillis);
#endif
    }

    // Poll.
    int result = ALOOPER_POLL_WAKE;
    mResponses.clear();
    mResponseIndex = 0;

    // We are about to idle.
    mIdling = true;

    struct epoll_event eventItems[EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS];
    int eventCount = epoll_wait(mEpollFd, eventItems, EPOLL_MAX_EVENTS, timeoutMillis); // 关键。等待wake通知

    // No longer idling.
    mIdling = false;

    // Acquire lock.
    mLock.lock();

    // Check for poll error.
    if (eventCount < 0) {
        if (errno == EINTR) {
            goto Done;
        }
        ALOGW("Poll failed with an unexpected error, errno=%d", errno);
        result = ALOOPER_POLL_ERROR;
        goto Done;
    }

    // Check for poll timeout.
    if (eventCount == 0) {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
        ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - timeout", this);
#endif
        result = ALOOPER_POLL_TIMEOUT;
        goto Done;
    }

    // Handle all events.
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
    ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - handling events from %d fds", this, eventCount);
#endif

    for (int i = 0; i < eventCount; i++) { // 处理全部事件
        int fd = eventItems[i].data.fd;
        uint32_t epollEvents = eventItems[i].events;
        if (fd == mWakeReadPipeFd) { 
            if (epollEvents & EPOLLIN) {
                awoken(); // 调用Looper::awoken()，运行实际的wake通知
            } else {
                ALOGW("Ignoring unexpected epoll events 0x%x on wake read pipe.", epollEvents);
            }
        } else {
            ssize_t requestIndex = mRequests.indexOfKey(fd);
            if (requestIndex >= 0) {
                int events = 0;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLIN) events |= ALOOPER_EVENT_INPUT;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLOUT) events |= ALOOPER_EVENT_OUTPUT;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLERR) events |= ALOOPER_EVENT_ERROR;
                if (epollEvents & EPOLLHUP) events |= ALOOPER_EVENT_HANGUP;
                pushResponse(events, mRequests.valueAt(requestIndex)); // push到mRequest上
            } else {
                ALOGW("Ignoring unexpected epoll events 0x%x on fd %d that is "
                        "no longer registered.", epollEvents, fd);
            }
        }
    }
Done: ;

    // Invoke pending message callbacks.调用等待的消息回调
    mNextMessageUptime = LLONG_MAX;
    while (mMessageEnvelopes.size() != 0) {
        nsecs_t now = systemTime(SYSTEM_TIME_MONOTONIC);
        const MessageEnvelope& messageEnvelope = mMessageEnvelopes.itemAt(0);
        if (messageEnvelope.uptime <= now) {
            // Remove the envelope from the list.
            // We keep a strong reference to the handler until the call to handleMessage
            // finishes.  Then we drop it so that the handler can be deleted *before*
            // we reacquire our lock.
            { // obtain handler
                sp<MessageHandler> handler = messageEnvelope.handler;
                Message message = messageEnvelope.message;
                mMessageEnvelopes.removeAt(0);
                mSendingMessage = true;
                mLock.unlock();

#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE || DEBUG_CALLBACKS
                ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - sending message: handler=%p, what=%d",
                        this, handler.get(), message.what);
#endif
                handler->handleMessage(message); // 调用Message回调（MessageHandler）
            } // release handler

            mLock.lock();
            mSendingMessage = false;
            result = ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK;
        } else {
            // The last message left at the head of the queue determines the next wakeup time.
            mNextMessageUptime = messageEnvelope.uptime;
            break;
        }
    }

    // Release lock.
    mLock.unlock();

    // Invoke all response callbacks.调用全部响应回调
    for (size_t i = 0; i < mResponses.size(); i++) {
        Response& response = mResponses.editItemAt(i);
        if (response.request.ident == ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK) {
            int fd = response.request.fd;
            int events = response.events;
            void* data = response.request.data;
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE || DEBUG_CALLBACKS
            ALOGD("%p ~ pollOnce - invoking fd event callback %p: fd=%d, events=0x%x, data=%p",
                    this, response.request.callback.get(), fd, events, data);
#endif
            int callbackResult = response.request.callback->handleEvent(fd, events, data); // 调用事件回调（LooperCallback）
            if (callbackResult == 0) {
                removeFd(fd);
            }
            // Clear the callback reference in the response structure promptly because we
            // will not clear the response vector itself until the next poll.
            response.request.callback.clear();
            result = ALOOPER_POLL_CALLBACK;
        }
    }
    return result;
}

Looper.cpp

void Looper::awoken() {
#if DEBUG_POLL_AND_WAKE
    ALOGD("%p ~ awoken", this);
#endif

    char buffer[16];
    ssize_t nRead;
    do {
        nRead = read(mWakeReadPipeFd, buffer, sizeof(buffer)); // 读到暂时的buffer，
    } while ((nRead == -1 && errno == EINTR) || nRead == sizeof(buffer));
}

Looper.cpp

Looper::awoken的read从mWakeReadFd上读出的消息被放在一个暂时的buffer上，这再次表明了这个pipe之作唤醒通知之用，并不关心实际内容。

nativeIsIdling 和 nativeDestroy

剩下的两个native方法的实现都很easy，先看nativeIdling：

static jboolean android_os_MessageQueue_nativeIsIdling(JNIEnv* env, jclass clazz, jint ptr) {
    NativeMessageQueue* nativeMessageQueue = reinterpret_cast<NativeMessageQueue*>(ptr);
    return nativeMessageQueue->getLooper()->isIdling();
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

NativeMessageQueue::getLooper：

    inline sp<Looper> getLooper() const {
        return mLooper;
    }

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

bool Looper::isIdling() const {
    return mIdling;
}

Looper.cpp

再看nativeDestroy：

static void android_os_MessageQueue_nativeDestroy(JNIEnv* env, jclass clazz, jint ptr) {
    NativeMessageQueue* nativeMessageQueue = reinterpret_cast<NativeMessageQueue*>(ptr);
    nativeMessageQueue->decStrong(env);
}

android_os_MessageQueue.cpp

nativeDestroy将nativeMessageQueue的强引用减1，引用计数减为0时，对象会自己主动被析构并回收。

小结

隐藏在nativePollOnce和nativeWake背后起着重要作用的事实上是pipe。nativeWake向pipe的写端写一个字节，通知前台线程“有消息来了”。

总结

后台线程使用Handler更新UI的本质上是“生产者消费者问题”。后台线程扮演生产者，生产消息（Message），并放到消息队列上。前台线程扮演消费者。从消息队列上取消息。并处理（消费）它。

在这个过程中Handler扮演了两个角色：

1. 消息队列的窗体，后台线程通过Handler.sendMessage()向消息队列放消息；
2. 处理消息的回调，前台线程通过Handler.handleMessage()处理从队列上取下来的消息。
   

引申

本文开头所给的两个Demo都是“单生产者单消费者问题”。

这个问题中须要指出的是。消费者必定唯一。由于每一个线程最多仅仅能仅仅有一个Looper（通过Looper.prepare创建）。而MessageQueue是由Looper的构造方法创建的。所以每一个Looper相应一个MessageQueue；所以不可能有多个消费者线程共享一个MessageQueue。

但生产者能够不必唯一，比方本文开头的Demo1，按下Button之后，会创建一个后台线程。这个线程每一个1秒更新一次TextView，更新10次后结束。当你点下Button后不到10秒（比方5秒）时。再次点下Button，此时又创建了一个后台线程；这时两个后台线程都是生产者。感兴趣的朋友能够自己试试，看看实际执行的效果。

pipe是仅仅有两个端的结构。多生产者时，有多个线程向写端write，但始终仅仅有一个线程从读端read。

所以，nativePollOnce能够实现为堵塞的，即pipe的读端mWakeReadPipeFd能够不设为NONBLOCK（当然也就不须要要用epoll了）。

但因为可能存在多个生产者，所以pipe的写端设为NONBLOCK还是非常有必要的。