基础知识:Arraylist、vector、Linkedlist的比较

   

总结

   

首先它们的底层实现不同,Arraylistvector都是基于数组实现的,而Linkedlist是基于链表实现的

   

另外虽然vector和arraylist都同样是基于数组实现的,但vector的源码中有很多synchronized方法,说明是线程安全的,同步的,而Arraylist是线程不安全的,非同步的

   

由于加了很多synchronized方法,造成vector会慢

   

比如我同样往这两种数据结构中加入2,000,000个同样的字符串,比较其插入的时间

   

86 millis has passed when using Arraylist.

124 millis has passed when using Vector.

   

测试代码

   

public class ArraylistAndLinkedlistAndVector {

private static final String base = " base string. ";

private static final int count = 2000000;

   

public static void ArraylistTest() {

long begin, end;

begin = System.currentTimeMillis();

ArrayList list = new ArrayList<>();

for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {

list.add(" add ");

}

end = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println((end - begin)

+ " millis has passed when using Arraylist. ");

}

   

public static void linkedlistTest() {

long begin, end;

begin = System.currentTimeMillis();

LinkedList list = new LinkedList<>();

for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {

list.add("add");

}

end = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println((end - begin)

+ " millis has passed when using Linkedlist. ");

}

   

public static void vectorTest() {

long begin, end;

begin = System.currentTimeMillis();

Vector vector = new Vector<>();

StringBuilder test = new StringBuilder(base);

for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {

vector.add("add");

}

end = System.currentTimeMillis();

System.out.println((end - begin)

+ " millis has passed when using Vector. ");

}

   

public static void main(String[] args) {

ArraylistTest();

linkedlistTest();

vectorTest();

   

}

  

原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/keedor/p/4473404.html