ThreadPoolExecutor 中为什么WorkQueue会在corePoolSize满了之后入队

简介

看别人的博客, 不清楚为什么会入队.

code

   public void execute(Runnable command) {
        if (command == null)
            throw new NullPointerException();
        /*
         * Proceed in 3 steps:
         *
         * 1. If fewer than corePoolSize threads are running, try to 简单来说就是如果小于corePoolSize直接创建新线程
         * start a new thread with the given command as its first
         * task.  The call to addWorker atomically checks runState and
         * workerCount, and so prevents false alarms that would add
         * threads when it shouldn't, by returning false.
         *
         * 2. If a task can be successfully queued, then we still need 
         * to double-check whether we should have added a thread
         * (because existing ones died since last checking) or that
         * the pool shut down since entry into this method. So we
         * recheck state and if necessary roll back the enqueuing if
         * stopped, or start a new thread if there are none.
         *
         * 3. If we cannot queue task, then we try to add a new
         * thread.  If it fails, we know we are shut down or saturated
         * and so reject the task.
         */
        int c = ctl.get();
        if (workerCountOf(c) < corePoolSize) {
            if (addWorker(command, true))
                return;
            c = ctl.get();
        }
        if (isRunning(c) && workQueue.offer(command)) { // 反正只要正在运行着, 就会直接入队了. 入队也会有四种判定方式, 一种是直接提交队列, 就是大于corePoolSize, 小于maxPoolSize创建新的线程. 一种是无界队列, 反正来的任务都等着执行, 还有有界, 就是大于corePoolSize, 且大于设定的有界个数, 才会去创建新的线程. 
            int recheck = ctl.get();
            if (! isRunning(recheck) && remove(command))
                reject(command);
            else if (workerCountOf(recheck) == 0)
                addWorker(null, false);
        }
        else if (!addWorker(command, false))
            reject(command);
    }
Hope is a good thing,maybe the best of things,and no good thing ever dies.----------- Andy Dufresne
原文地址:https://www.cnblogs.com/eat-too-much/p/15131843.html